Luis Rubiales Drama

Fallout from Leadership: Rubiales’ Ouster and Potential 15-Year Ban

The sudden removal of Luis Rubiales from his role as the president of the Spanish Football Federation has sent shockwaves through the football world. His once-respected position has been compromised, leading to a series of significant consequences that reach far beyond the boundaries of Spain. Amidst this upheaval, FIFA’s investigation into Rubiales’ actions looms large, threatening to impose a 15-year ban on the former president. This potential punishment, as disclosed by the “Daily Mail,” not only highlights the severity of the situation but also underscores the enforcement power of the FIFA Disciplinary Code. The intricate dynamics of leadership and governance within football organizations come to the forefront as the world watches how this high-stakes drama unfolds.

A Multi-Million Dollar Blow for Rubiales

Luis Rubiales’ fall from grace has brought forth substantial financial repercussions, further compounding the challenges he faces. Stripped of his presidency, Rubiales finds himself not only without a position of authority but also grappling with significant financial losses. With his former salary of R$ 3 million now forfeited due to his suspension, his financial stability takes a hit. Moreover, the loss of his role as a member of the UEFA Executive Committee, accompanied by its R$ 1.3 million earnings, further contributes to his financial woes. This combination of losses culminates in a staggering amount of around R$ 5 million. As Rubiales navigates the legal and ethical dimensions of his situation, the monetary consequences underscore the multifaceted nature of his downfall.

FIFA Investigation and Broader Implications

The catalyst for the cascade of events leading to Luis Rubiales’ downfall is the investigation launched by FIFA in response to his inappropriate behavior. The incident involving a forced kiss on Jenni Hermoso, a player in the Spanish national team, has sparked concerns about his adherence to ethical standards outlined in the FIFA Disciplinary Code, specifically referencing article 13. As the investigation unfolds, the legal dimension of the situation becomes increasingly pronounced. The Public Prosecutor’s Office of the National Court of Spain has filed a lawsuit against Rubiales, amplifying the legal ramifications of his actions. Beyond the legal aspects, the incident also brings to light broader questions about consent and respect within the sports community.

On another front, the situation introduces a human element, as the Public Prosecutor’s Office endeavors to examine the perspective of Jenni Hermoso. The player’s potential intention to file a complaint against the removed RFEF president signifies the gravity of the incident. Within a prescribed timeframe of 15 days, Hermoso is expected to respond to inquiries, while also being informed about her rights as a victim of a perceived act of sexual assault. In the public domain, Hermoso has already taken a stance, offering insight into her viewpoint regarding the incident.

The fall of Luis Rubiales from the presidency of the Spanish Football Federation reverberates through the realms of leadership, finance, law, ethics, and human rights. As FIFA’s investigation progresses, the far-reaching consequences of his actions continue to unfold, leaving an indelible mark on the football landscape and prompting a broader dialogue on accountability, conduct, and safeguarding within the sports community.

A Mother’s Resolute Stand

As the storm of controversy rages around Luis Rubiales, a poignant and resolute gesture emerges from his mother, who stands firmly in defense of her son. In a bold move that underscores the depth of her conviction, she has taken up a hunger strike as a form of protest against any potential penalties that might be imposed on Rubiales. Her determination to safeguard her son’s reputation transcends the boundaries of a family bond and becomes a powerful statement of support in the face of adversity. Amidst the legal intricacies, financial ramifications, and ethical debates, her hunger strike adds a unique dimension to the narrative, emphasizing the lengths to which a loved one is willing to go to protect and uphold the honor of a family member. Her unwavering stance further underscores the human complexities that intertwine with the broader discussions surrounding Rubiales’ actions and their consequences.

FIFA Bans Goalkeepers from provoking during Penalty kicks

IFAB amend sections of penalty-kick rules

The International Football Association Board (IFAB), the governing body responsible for setting the rules of football, recently released their 2023-24 law changes report, which includes significant rule changes for penalty kicks. Specifically, these changes are outlined in Law 14, known as ‘The Penalty Kick.’

One key modification highlighted in the report is that goalkeepers will no longer be permitted to unfairly distract penalty takers. The new rule emphasizes the importance of respect for the game and the opponent, stating that the goalkeeper must not engage in behavior that fails to demonstrate such respect, including unfairly distracting the kicker.

To provide further clarity, the rule specifies that the defending goalkeeper must remain on the goal line, facing the kicker, positioned between the goalposts, without making contact with the goalposts, crossbar, or goal net until the ball is kicked. Moreover, the goalkeeper must not engage in any actions that unfairly distract the kicker, such as delaying the penalty kick or touching the goal frame.

These changes are set to come into effect from July 1, 2023, and will impact penalty kicks in football matches worldwide.

Criticisms amidst players and pundits

E. Martínez

The introduction of these new regulations has generated mixed reactions among players and experts in the football community. Emiliano Martinez, the goalkeeper for the Argentine national team known for his antics to distract penalty takers, acknowledged the rule changes and expressed his willingness to adapt. Having already experienced success in saving crucial penalties in tournaments like the Copa America and the World Cup, Martinez noted that he would comply with the modern rules and FIFA’s requirements.

On the other hand, AC Milan goalkeeper Mike Maignan displayed his discontent with the rule changes through a sarcastic tweet. Maignan mocked the potential future rule in 2026, suggesting that goalkeepers would be required to turn their backs to the shot during penalty kicks, with the opposition awarded an indirect freekick if the penalty was saved. This tweet implies his dissatisfaction with the evolving rules.

Ian Wright’s remarks

Additionally, former Arsenal player Ian Wright criticized the rule changes, labeling them as “ridiculous.” Wright’s statement suggests his disagreement with the new regulations surrounding penalty kicks.

As the football community adjusts to these amendments, it remains to be seen how these changes will impact the dynamics and strategies employed during penalty kicks in future matches.


FIFA is changing the offside rule

The landscape of football is on the verge of witnessing another change as the offside rule undergoes yet another adaptation. This upcoming modification, proposed by Arsene Wenger in his capacity as FIFA’s Chief of Global Football Development, aims to redefine which part of the body is considered onside, sparking a potential division of opinions among football enthusiasts worldwide.

The introduction of VAR has brought certain rules, such as handball and offside, under increasing scrutiny and controversy. In an effort to bring greater clarity to the offside rule, Wenger’s proposal has gained traction, with FIFA working towards implementing these developments. The objective is to refine the rule and offer a new interpretation of the body part that determines offside decisions.

Under the new proposal, the entirety of the player’s goal-scoring body would be taken into account. This means that if any part of the attacker’s body remains behind the last defender, they would be deemed onside. Currently, a player is considered offside if any part of their body is ahead of the second-last defender, including the goalkeeper. The proposed changes would provide an advantage to attackers and potentially create a challenge for teams employing a high defensive line, such as Liverpool.

To assess the viability and effectiveness of the new proposals, trials will be conducted in countries like the Netherlands, Sweden, and Italy. These trial runs will evaluate the rule’s impact before potentially implementing it in football competitions worldwide.

Wenger’s proposals

A. Wenger

Since assuming his role at FIFA after departing from Arsenal in 2018, Arsene Wenger has put forward several innovative suggestions. Some of his notable proposals include shortening match length to 60 minutes and transitioning to a two-year World Cup cycle. However, these ideas have not yet been put into practice.

Last year, Wenger stirred controversy by proposing the replacement of throw-ins with ‘kick-ins’. Although the idea sparked debates within IFAB, the body responsible for football’s rule-making, it was ultimately not implemented.

The latest proposals regarding the offside rule are set to undergo trials, indicating the potential for a significant shift in the dynamics of both attacking and defending throughout the game. Should these trials prove successful, football may witness a notable change in how offside decisions are determined, affecting strategies and gameplay at all levels of the sport.

The current application of the offside rule has often resulted in intricate Video Assistant Referee (VAR) checks and contentious decisions, as players have been deemed offside when any part of their body capable of playing the ball is ahead of the last defender. These marginal calls have frequently led to goals being disallowed, causing frustration and controversy among players, fans, and pundits alike.

Arsene Wenger, a highly respected former manager, advocates for a change in the offside rule. He proposes that an entire player’s body, rather than just a specific part, must be ahead of the last defender to be considered offside. This adjustment aims to reduce the subjectivity and fine margins involved in offside decisions, providing a clearer and more straightforward interpretation of the rule.

IFAB’s injunction

FIFA, acknowledging the merit of Wenger’s proposals, is set to take action. The first league to experiment with the proposed changes will be Sweden, as reported by Sports Joe. The country’s men’s U-21 and women’s U-19 leagues will implement the new rules in order to evaluate their impact on the game. Following the trial period in Sweden, the proposed changes will be introduced in other leagues, including those in the Netherlands and Italy.

Once the trial phase concludes, FIFA will convene to analyze the outcomes and discuss the potential adoption of the revised offside rule. The governing body will then present the proposal to the International Football Association Board (IFAB), the organization responsible for approving permanent rules in the game of football.

This comprehensive approach demonstrates FIFA’s commitment to ensuring fairness and improving the offside rule. By implementing the proposed changes gradually and carefully evaluating their impact, FIFA aims to make informed decisions that will ultimately shape the future of the game and provide a more consistent and transparent application of the offside rule.